Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 P.3d 175 - Ryan v. State

Ryan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 79 Wash. 2d 12 - State Ex Rel. Carroll v. Junker · 123 Wash. 2d 641 - State v. Hill · In Re Marriage of Littlefield · In re the Marriage of Littlefield · State v. Long

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Clients often must accept the drawbacks of a contingent fee arrangement if they want to acquire an attorney at all. Attorneys must do the same.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “manifestly unreasonable or based on untenable grounds.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.