State v. Waletich’s Empirical Analysis
1927
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1999
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Melcher v. State · 6 Okla. Crim. 384 - Jordan v. State · Novotny v. State · 96 Tex. Crim. 6 - Brock v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“all of the provisions of the intoxicating liquor laws of this state shall be liberally construed for the enforcement thereof, and that no shift, device, art, or contrivance whatever, which is used or practiced to evade the law, ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dillon v. State“upon a higher plane than other criminal laws.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dillon v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.