Ex Parte Ingram’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
27 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Co. · Withrow v. Williams · Ganey v. North Carolina
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“presided over Ingram's capital murder trial and personally observed the performance of both lawyers throughout Ingram's trial and sentencing.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“... [T]he general rule is that, where a trial court does in fact adopt the proposed order as its own, deference is owed to that order in the same measure as any other order of the trial court. In Dobyne v. State , 805 So.2d 733 , 741 (Ala.Crim.App.2000), the Court of Criminal Appeals stated:”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Bell , 593 So.2d at 126 (emphasis added). The undisputed facts in the present case obviously prevent a similar conclusion here.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.