Crombie v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 616 So. 2d 436 - Miller v. Schou · Botterbusch v. Botterbusch · 791 So. 2d 1148 - Dorta-Duque v. Dorta-Duque · 964 So. 2d 732 - Muller v. Muller · 917 So. 2d 1038 - Fredman v. Fredman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We find no abuse of discretion in the trial judge's decision that staying in South Florida was in the child's best interest and denying relocation.”); Young v. Hector, 740 So.2d 1153, 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.