51 So. 3d 764 - State v. CURINGTON’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Oliveaux · State v. Weiland · Wrenn v. Weinberger · 824 So. 2d 1063 - State v. LaCaze
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Unless the defendant has been granted pretrial discovery, if the state intends to introduce a confession or inculpatory statement in evidence, it shall so advise the defendant in writing prior to beginning the state’s opening statement. If it fails to do so a confession or inculpatory statement shall not be admissible in evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“an out of court admission of incriminating facts made by the defendant after the crime has been committed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.