Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 SO3D 911 - Flowers v. State

Flowers v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 941 So. 2d 735 - Rubenstein v. State · Strong v. State · Davis v. State · 601 So. 2d 403 - Knight v. State · 892 So. 2d 236 - Stodghill v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Flight” is a circumstance from which guilty knowledge and/or fear of arrest may be inferred. If you believe from the evidence in this case beyond a reasonable doubt that .., [Anderson] did flee or go into hiding, such flight or hiding is to be considered in connection with all other evidence in this case. You will determine from all the facts whether such flight or hiding was from a conscious sense of guilt or whether it Vas caused by other, things and give it such weight as you think it is entitled to in determining the guilt or innocence of [Anderson].”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.