Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 SW2D 1067 - Ingram v. Central Bitulithic Co.

Ingram v. Central Bitulithic Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 1991
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 1991

4 state decisions

201932194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Leeson v. City of Houston · Walcott v. Kershner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well settled that the purchaser under an executory contract of sale acquires equitable title to the realty; having the exclusive right to sue for damages to the freehold. Thus in Leeson v. City of Houston, Tex.Com.App., 243 S.W. 485, 488 , the Court stated: “By the great weight of authority it is now held that, although the legal title does not pass to the vendee under a contract of sale until actual delivery of a deed to the property still the vendee under such contract of purchase, especially where he goes into possession of the property, is invested with the equitable title from the date of the contract, or in any event, form the date he takes possession, and any increment, advantage, or enhancement to the property inures to his benefit, and any detriment, depreciation, or loss thereto without fault of either party must be borne by him.” See also Rives v. James, Tex.Civ.App., 3 S.W.2d 932 ; Ingram v. Central Bitulithic Co., Tex. Civ.App., 51 S.W.2d 1067 ; Dimmitt Elevator Co. v. Carter, Tex.Civ.App., 70 S.W.2d 615 ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.