Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 U.S. 225 - Philip Greely Junior v. William Thompson

Philip Greely Junior v. William Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

51 U.S. 225 · 1850

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
10
cited 10 times by the Supreme Court
March 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions (10 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2019 · most notably Ash Sheep Co. v. United States (1920), Helwig v. United States (1903)

1 federal appellate · 4 district ·

10018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jonathan Meredith v. The United States · Trigg v. Drew

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The orders as well as the opinions of the head of the treasury department, expressed in either letters or circulars, are entitled to much respect, and will always be duly weighed by this court; but it is the laws which are to govern, rather than their opinions of them; and importers, in cases of doubt, are entitled to have their rights 'settled by the judicial exposition of those laws, rather than by the views of the department.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Besides this, it would be unreasonable to overturn the invoices and oaths of importers, unless by a personal inspection and examination; * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.