Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 WASH 630 - State v. Storey

State v. Storey’s Empirical Analysis

1909

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
3
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably Amalgamated Transit v. State (2000), 142 Wash. 2d 183 - Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. State (2000)

27 state decisions

60190919101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . The mere fact that the act does not take effect until the contingency arises, does not indicate a delegation of legislative power, even where the contingency depends upon the action of certain persons. ... In such cases it cannot be said that legislative authority is delegated. The local judgment merely accepts or rejects the operation of the legislative act. ...””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.