Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 Wash. App. 397 - State v. Martinez

51 Wash. App. 397 - State v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
March 2006
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anthony v. United States · United States v. Espinosa · Federal Power Commission v. Florida Power & Light Co. · United States v. Ferrone · United States v. Jarvis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where the warrant does not specifically name the person to be searched, then some other means reasonable under the circumstances must be used to assist in identifying the person—either his occupation, personal appearance, peculiarities, or place of residence____ Here no particularities were given, not even that “John Doe” resided at the premises described in the warrant. Thus, the search of Rollie’s person was improper and the trial court erred in failing to suppress the evidence____”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.