51 Wash. App. 408 - State v. Hatfield’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 2004
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Glasser v. United States · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Holloway v. Arkansas · Wood v. Georgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he rule in conflict cases is "not quite the per se rule of prejudice that exists for [other] Sixth Amendment claims.” Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 692 , 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2067 , 80 L. Ed. 2d 674 (1984). Rather, "[prejudice is presumed only if the defendant demonstrates that counsel 'actively represented conflicting interests’ and that 'an actual conflict of interest adversely affected his lawyer’s performance.’ ” (Italics ours.) Strickland, 466 U.S. at 692 (quoting Cuyler, 446 U.S. at 348, 350 ); see also Richardson, 100 Wn.2d at 677 . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“not quite the per se rule of prejudice that exists for [other] Sixth Amendment claims.” Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 692 , 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2067 , 80 L. Ed. 2d 674 (1984). Rather,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`[W]ithout an assertion that counsel's performance was deficient, it is impossible to demonstrate that counsel's conflict `adversely affected' counsel's performance.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dhaliwal
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.