Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 51 Wash. App. 836 - State v. Johnson

51 Wash. App. 836 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
April 2008
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2008

10 state decisions

60198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 107 Wash. 2d 503 - Addleman v. Board of Prison Terms and Paroles · 85 Wash. 2d 196 - State v. Heath · 46 Wash. App. 52 - State v. Garrison · 46 Wash. App. 622 - In Re the Personal Restraint of Rolston · 44 Wash. App. 281 - State v. Welty

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Were we to uphold the State’s position (classification should be according to the punishment as it was at the time the crime was committed), a person who had committed the crime of taking a motor vehicle in 1974 would be subject to a 10-year wash-out provision, while an individual who committed the same crime the following year would only be subject to a 5-year wash-out provision. Such a result would denigrate the uniform treatment of defendants which is at the very heart of the SRA.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “commensurate with the punishment imposed on others committing similar offenses”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “does not superimpose exactly the SRA upon the prior system.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.