Real v. Simon’s Empirical Analysis
510 F.2d 557 · 1975
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably United States v. Yoshida International, Inc. (1975), Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (1980)
27 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission · Graham v. Richardson · Morton v. Ruiz · Silver v. New York Stock Exchange · Posadas v. National City Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If neither the government of Cuba nor any person in Cuba has any interest or claim to the blocked property, the Trading with the Enemy Act would be inapplicable....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is arbitrary and without basis in either the language or the purpose of the Trading with the Enemy Act.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Absent clear and unequivocal evidence of such intent, we are unwilling to announce a limitation of the President’s powers to conduct the foreign affairs of this country. . [footnotes omitted] We find no inconsistency in the two acts, and believe that the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 should be viewed as bolstering, rather than limiting, the powers of the Executive Branch to deal with the Cuban problem. Our conclusion that the regulatory scheme in general has statutory authorization does not, however, decide the issue whether the application of the regulations to the unique facts of this case is consistent with the legislation from which the regulations derive their power.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.