Glover v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2008 · most notably Bill Martin Director Michigan Department of Correctionss v. Everett Hadix (1999), Glover v. Johnson (1991)
11 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 4943 · 26 U.S.C. § 4944 · 26 U.S.C. § 4945 · 26 U.S.C. § 501
Relies on Bounds v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]hat the State, while not obligated to provide a four-year baccalaureate program at Huron Valley Women’s Facility, shall assist and cooperate in the establishment and operation (including the provision of space) of a baccalaureate program which any four-year college desires to offer women inmates; and in no way shall that assistance be less than that provided to colleges offering baccalaureate programs at men’s prisons.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Glover v. Johnson“to ensure that departmental wage policy is applied fairly to women inmates whose job functions are comparable to those performed by male prisoners at similarly-sized institutions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Glover v. Johnson“a systematic and coherent course package which, when successfully completed, culminates in the receipt of an Associate's Degree.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Glover v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.