510 So. 2d 1180 - State v. Floyd’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 1998
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 335 So. 2d 880 - Mobley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“316.1933 Blood Test for Impairment or Intoxication in Cases of Death or Serious Bodily Injury; Right to Use Reasonable Force (1) Notwithstanding any recognized ability to refuse to submit to the tests provided in s. 316.1932 or any recognized power to revoke the implied consent to such tests, if a law enforcement officer has probable cause to believe that a motor vehicle driven by or in the actual physical control of a person under the influence of alcoholic beverages ... has caused the death or serious bodily injury of a human being, such person shall submit, upon the request of a law enforcement officer to a test of the person’s blood for the purpose of determining the alcoholic content thereof ... The law enforcement officer may use reasonable force if necessary to require such person to submit to the administration of the blood test ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Henderson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.