In re Miller’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 524 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Relies on Kelly v. Robinson · United States v. Ursery · Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. Davenport · Barclays American/Business Credit, Inc. v. Long · Cheryl Bessette for Herself and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Avco Financial Services Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]bsent explicit Congressional intent to incorporate state law, the meaning of a term in a federal statute is a question of federal law, and the state label is not controlling.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Simmons
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.