Budde v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
511 F.2d 1033 · 1975
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co. (1977), Mobley v. McCormick (1994)
30 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co. · Rosenberg Bros. v. Curtis Brown Co. · Louisville Co v. Chatters Southern Ry Co · Morris & Co. v. Skandinavia Insurance · Eli Lilly & Co. v. Generix Drug Sales, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(w)hen a defendant moves to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, either party should be allowed discovery on the factual issues raised by that motion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“state law determines whether a corporation is subject to process in the state and federal decisions determine only if the state law is constitutional.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“which excludes their operation if the cause of action does not arise out of business done by the corporation in the state.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.