Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 511 F.2d 1097 - Anheuser-busch, Inc. v. Teamsters Local No. 633, National Conference of Brewery and Soft Drink Workers

Anheuser-busch, Inc. v. Teamsters Local No. 633, National Conference of Brewery and Soft Drink Workers’s Empirical Analysis

511 F.2d 1097 · 1975

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
October 2013
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 2013

14 federal appellate · 7 district ·

16019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770 · Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co. · Lubin v. Allison · Sinclair Refining Co. v. Atkinson · Detroit Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. Detroit Typographical Union No. 18

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although the district court’s findings on injury make reference to the fact that the plant was effectively shut down, an employer cannot be permitted to qualify for injunctive relief simply by responding to minor employee infractions in a way that brings serious and irreparable damage upon himself by causing a shutdown.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. ““[T]he District Court must, of course, consider whether issuance of an injunction would be warranted under ordinary principles of equity.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.