Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 511 F.2d 1165 - Blaha v. United States

Blaha v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

511 F.2d 1165 · 1975

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
June 2011
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently June 2011 · most notably Starr v. Federal Aviation Administration (1978), Department of the Navy Military Sealift Command v. Federal Labor Relations Authority (1988)

10 federal appellate · 4 district ·

15019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 5 U.S.C. § 5342 · 5 U.S.C. § 5348 · 5 U.S.C. § 5544 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 6301 (Federal Employees Family Friendly Leave Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 6305

Relies on Keeble v. United States · Bruce v. United States · Morris v. Florida · Amell v. United States · Daniels v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'public interest' exception [in § 5348] was written to provide flexibility needed to eliminate anomalies and inequities that might arise from a too literal conformity to industry pay practices.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “as nearly as is consistent with the public interest”, not to Government shoreside practice, but to private industry practice afloat: The reference to Blaha leads me to the observation that the court’s decision also collides head-on with the basic holding in Blaha . Strangely, the court relies on Blaha despite Judge Nichols’ pronouncement in that case that: We think the”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “* * * shall be fixed and adjusted from time to time as nearly as is consistent with the public interest in accordance with prevailing rates * * *”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.