Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 511 F.2d 164 - Rowell v. Treadwell Ford, Inc.

Rowell v. Treadwell Ford, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

511 F.2d 164 · 1975

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
February 1994
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 1994

1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

30197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Wilson & Co. v. Sims

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule in Alabama for the measure of damages for the injury to a commercial vehicle is the damages which would remunerate the plaintiff for necessary repairs in substantially restoring the vehicle to its former condition and the market value of its use or hire during the time required to make such repairs and fit it for business.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.