United States v. Marquez’s Empirical Analysis
511 F.2d 62 · 1975
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 1993
8 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 801 (§ 101 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Russell · United States v. Grinnell Corp. · Pell v. Procunier · Martinez v. United States · United States v. Pruitt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“G. “deliver” means the actual, constructive or attempted transfer from one person to another of a controlled substance whether or not there is an agency relationship [.] (Our emphasis.)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(other than by administering or dispensing) a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.