United States v. Weinstein’s Empirical Analysis
511 F.2d 622 · 1975
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2019 · most notably United States v. Stanford (1978), Bob Willow Motors, Inc. v. General Motors Corp. (1989)
27 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Baker v. Carr · United States v. Calandra · Jenkins v. McKeithen · Will v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We should make it clear that we do not intend to preclude Judge Weinstein from entertaining motions on behalf of fugitive defendants who have agreed that Professor Lusky or any other attorney represent them, [citation omitted]” Id. at 629 . 5”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The extraordinary writ of mandamus, which is rarely granted in civil cases, is even less frequently issued in criminal proceedings, principally because of policy reasons based upon the defendant’s rights under the Speedy Trial and Double Jeopardy provisions of the Constitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“was not designed as an authorization for pretrial discovery. Its purpose, on the contrary, is to protect the secrecy of the Grand Jury proceedings by restricting disclosure to the exceptional case where a particularized need is shown.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.