United States v. Nunes’s Empirical Analysis
511 F.2d 871 · 1975
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 2010
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 19 U.S.C. § 1401 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1441 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 482 · 19 U.S.C. § 66 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 952
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Falstaff Brewing Corp. v. Lines · Leiser v. United States · The Brig Concord
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Section 1441(4) would be meaningless unless it is an exception to the general provisions of section 1581(a).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.