Arreguin-Moreno v. Mukasey’s Empirical Analysis
511 F.3d 1229 · 2008
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Lin v. Attorney General of the United States (2008), Barrios v. Holder (2009)
10 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3585 · 18 U.S.C. § 4 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Vargas v. U.S. Department of Immigration & Naturalization · Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft · BURBANO · Abebe v. Gonzales · Sembiring v. Gonzales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“signal[s] that it had conducted an independent review of the record and had exercised its own discretion in determining that its conclusions were the same as those articulated by the IJ.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Karapetyan v. Holder
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.