United States v. Snyder’s Empirical Analysis
511 F.3d 813 · 2008
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably United States v. Summage (2009), United States v. El-Alamin (2009)
14 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Franks v. Delaware · Lovett v. United States · Regents of the University of California v. Doe · United States v. Hascall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To obtain a Franks hearing a defendant must make a substantial preliminary showing that there was an intentional or reckless false statement or omission which was necessary to the finding of probable cause .... Thus, to prevail on a Franks claim the defendant must first demonstrate that the law enforcement official deliberately or recklessly included a false statement in, or omitted a true statement from, his warrant affidavit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A supporting affidavit establishes probable cause to issue a search warrant if it 'sets forth sufficient facts to establish that there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of criminal activity will be found in the particular place to be searched.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]llegations of negligence or innocent mistake will not suffice to demonstrate reckless or deliberate falsehood.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.