United States v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
511 F.3d 87 · 2007
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 2023
8 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Drayton · United States v. Slade · United States v. Zapata · United States v. Chhien
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]pproaching a parked car and questioning the occupant does not necessarily rise to the level of a Terry stop....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Absent extraordinary circumstances, '[i]t is a bedrock rule that when a party has not presented an argument to the district court, [he] may not unveil it in the court of appeals.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“approaching individuals on the street or in other public places and putting questions to them if they are willing to listen,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.