Margherita v. FedEx Express’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Miller v. Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P. · Loeffler v. Staten Island University Hospital · Kuebel v. Black & Decker Inc. · Conroy v. New York State Department of Correctional Services · Albunio v. City of New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“job-related and consistent with business necessity”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.