Stumes v. Solem’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Please tell them that I didn't mean to kill her, that it was an accidentthat I'm not a vicious killer.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Stumes v. Delano · Solem v. Stumes“I don't give a damn what he says. I'm doing anything I feel like, and I'll talk to anybody I want to.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Stumes v. Solem · Solem v. Stumes“(1) previous interrogations were promptly terminated and petitioner’s right to cut off questioning was “scrupulously honored;” (2) questioning was resumed only after the passage of a significant period of time; (3) petitioner was given the full and complete Miranda warning at the outset of questioning on October 2 and said he understood it; (4) petitioner when asked if he was willing to talk to police officers indicated a willingness to do so; (5) petitioner did not at any time on October 2 assert or indicate that he did not want to talk to police or wanted to consult with counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stumes v. Solem
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.