Rogers v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 881 (§ 511 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 6323 · 26 U.S.C. § 6851 · 26 U.S.C. § 7429 · 31 U.S.C. § 1102
Relies on Loretto v. United States · United States v. One 1972 Datsun, Vehicle Identification No. LB1100355950 · United States v. T. C. Trigg, and Cross-Appellants, First State Bank, Crosset, Arkansas · O'Reilly v. United States · City of St. Paul v. Myles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“facts set out in Agent Langer’s affidavit regarding Rogers’ apparent means of making a living, the large amount of cash he had access to, and his past failure to file income tax returns indicate that it was reasonable for I.R.S. to conclude that termination proceedings were necessary.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.