Gipson v. Mattox’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 35 U.S.C. § 256
Relies on Mas-Hamilton Group v. LaGard, Inc. · Ethicon, Inc. v. United States Surgical Corp. · Caisse Nationale de Credit Agricole v. CBI Industries, Inc. · Jervis Webb Company v. Southern Systems Inc · American Home Assurance Co. v. Glenn Estess & Associates, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a motion to reconsider should not be used by the parties to set forth new theories of law”); American Home Assur. Co. v. Glenn Estess & Associates, Inc., 763 F.2d 1237, 1239 (11th Cir.1985) (cautioning against use of motion to reconsider to afford a litigant”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.