Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 511 NE2D 1084 - Maggio v. Lee

Maggio v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2002
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Trotcky v. Van Sickle · State v. Everett Holder · Kikkert v. Krumm · Hutts v. Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When it is intended that attorney's fees be included among the expenses which a party can recover, the rules expressly authorize the trial court to make such an award.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The court may award such costs as will reimburse the other parties for their actual expenses incurred from the delay,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “It has long been established in this State ... that the bare term”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.