Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 511 N.W.2d 21 - Heaslip v. Freeman

Heaslip v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
June 2009
most recently cited

21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Branzburg v. Hayes · Vermont v. Cox · Jones v. United States · Thiele v. Stich · Bulow Auersperg v. Bulow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n order to protect the public interest and the free flow of information, the news media should have the benefit of a substantial privilege not to reveal sources of information or to disclose unpublished information.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “look first to the specific statutory language and be guided by its natural and most obvious meaning.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[The first] sentence, read separately, could support both a privilege not to reveal sources of information and a privilege not to disclose unpublished information whether or not the information was confidential. The remaining text in the section, however, ties the unpublished information to the confidential relationship between the news media and its sources. Taking the section as a whole, the privilege not to disclose unpublished information appears to relate to unpublished information that would identify a source.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.