Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 511 NW2D 832 - Tucek v. Mueller

Tucek v. Mueller’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

1 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2023

1 district · 7 state decisions

401994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wilson v. Great Northern Railway Company · 153 Ill. 2d 473 - People Ex Rel. Hartigan v. E & E HAULING, INC. · Garrett v. BankWest, Inc. · Midland National Bank of Minneapolis v. Perranoski · Breen v. Dakota Gear & Joint Co., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “One who has executed a release or compromise of a cause of action sometimes feels that he was unduly pushed or fraudulently induced into making the agreement. In this situation there are several courses open to him. He may sue on the original cause of action and, when the release is tendered as a defense, assert its invalidity. He may begin an equity action to set aside or reform the release or compromise agreement. Or he may affirm the agreement and bring an action of deceit to recover the damages he suffered by reason of executing the same.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is not true, by one who does not believe it to be true; (2) The assertion, as a fact, of that which is not true, by one who has no reasonable ground for beheving it to be true; (3) The suppression of a fact by one who is bound to disclose it, or who gives information of other facts which are likely to mislead for want of communication of that fact; or (4) A promise made without any intention of performing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.