Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 511 P2D 1074 - Hollaus v. Arend

Hollaus v. Arend’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently November 2021

11 state decisions

50197319801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Palfy v. Rice · Rego v. Decker · Dale v. Greater Anchorage Area Borough · Alaska Creamery Products, Inc. v. Wells · Froelicher v. Hadley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[al greater degree of certainty is required for specific performance than for damages, because of the difficulty of framing a decree specifying the performance required, as compared with the relative facility with which a breach may be perceived for purposes of awarding damages.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““(2) In actions where the money judgment is not an accurate criteria [sic] for determining the fee to be allowed to the prevailing side, the court shall award a fee commensurate with the amount and value of legal services rendered.” (emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Should no recovery be had, attorney’s fees for the prevailing party may be fixed by the court as a part of the costs of the action, in its discretion, in a reasonable amount.” (emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.