Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 511 P.3d 952 - In re Long

In re Long’s Empirical Analysis

2022

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Jones · In re Spiegel · In re Long · In re Long · In re Long (

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[o]ur primary concern must remain protection of the public interest and maintenance of the confidence of the public and the integrity of the Bar.' [Citation omitted.]”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “61. Attorneys must act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing their clients. See KRPC 1.3. The respondent failed to diligently and promptly represent R.F. and A.W.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “67. KRPC 1.4(a) provides that '[a] lawyer shall keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and promptly comply with reasonable requests for information.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.