511 So. 2d 1127 - Hungerford v. Mathews’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Harper · Soven v. Sun Bank of Miami · Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. State · 499 So. 2d 917 - Saul v. JOHN D. AND CATHERINE T. MacARTHUR · Gomez v. Couvertier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The facts or data upon which an expert bases an opinion or inference may be those perceived by, or made known to, him at or before the trial. If the facts or data are of a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the subject to support the opinion expressed, the facts or data need not be admissible in evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.