Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 511 SO2D 1306 - Feazel v. Howard

Feazel v. Howard’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2014

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

201987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Succession of Zebriska · Frost Lumber Industries, Inc. v. Harrison · 45 La. Ann. 398 - Roe v. Heirs of Bundy · 467 So. 2d 1202 - James Harvey Ramsey Estate, Inc. v. Pace · 300 So. 2d 599 - WJ Gayle & Sons, Inc. v. Deperrodil

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The exercise of possession over a thing with the permission of or on behalf of the owner or possessor is precarious possession.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[o]ne is presumed to intend to possess as owner unless he began to possess in the name of and for another.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a]cquisitive prescription does not run in favor of a precarious possessor or his universal successor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.