Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 511 So. 2d 1333 - Johnson v. State

511 So. 2d 1333 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
January 2006
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2006 · most notably Clemons v. Mississippi (1990), Johnson v. Mississippi (1988)

5 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

140198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Gregg v. Georgia · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Furman v. Georgia · United States v. Cronic

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]ny court seeking to determine whether the constitutional guaranty has been met, must look at the entire performance of the attorney and determine whether the defense attorney was competent and whether he sincerely tried to assist his client.... Unless the mistake or conduct was of such magnitude that the court concludes the lawyer was incompetent or evidenced a failure to conscientiously fulfill his adversarial role, we will conclude the constitutional guarantee for performance of counsel as enunciated in Strickland has been met.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Direct appeal shall be the principal means of reviewing all criminal convictions and sentences, and the purpose of this chapter is to provide prisoners with a procedure, limited in nature, to review those objections, defenses, claims, questions, issues or errors which in practical reality could not be or should not have been raised at trial or on direct appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “and it was incumbent upon a defendant to show that”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.