Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

511 So. 2d 282

511 So.2d 282

12 Fla.L.Weekly 330

Naugle v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 2, 1987

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1987-07-02

Cited by 9 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1989

8 state decisions

Relies on 496 So. 2d 130 - State v. Bivona · 497 So. 2d 664 - Naugle v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1987-07-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

EHRLICH, Justice.

¶1We have for review Naugle v. State, 497 So.2d 664, 665 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) in which the Second District Court of Appeal certified the following question:

DOES FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.191(b)(1) APPLY TO PERSONS HELD IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS SOLELY ON THE BASIS OF CHARGES PENDING IN THIS STATE?

¶2We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

¶3Consistent with our recent decision in State v. Bivona, 496 So.2d 130 (Fla.1986), the district court below concluded that Rule 3.191(b)(1) does so apply. Accordingly, the decision below is approved.

¶4It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
/511/so2d/282 · .json · Public domain