¶1We affirm except that appellant, former wife, is entitled to an award for fees for the services of attorney Chaykin, both under the authority of Lewis v. Lewis, 383 So.2d 1143 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), (because of the extensive and unnecessary expenditure of attorney’s time caused by the behavior of appellee) and under Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980), (because of the disparate financial circumstances of the parties). We remand for a hearing to determine a reasonable attorney’s fee to be awarded for the benefit of appellant against appellee.
511 So. 2d 400
511 So.2d 400
12 Fla.L.Weekly 1846
Yablon v. Yablon
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 29, 1987
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1987-07-29
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1989
1 state decisions
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 383 So. 2d 1143 - Lewis v. Lewis
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1987-07-29
View the full empirical analysis of this case →