511 So. 2d 536 - First Interstate Dev. Corp. v. Ablanedo’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 62 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably St. Laurent v. Ambrose (1993), Martinmaas v. Engelmann (2000)
2 federal appellate · 62 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 412 So. 2d 461 - Swartz v. Swartz · State Ex Rel. Pensacola News-Journal, Inc. v. Fleet · Winn & Lovett Grocery Co. v. Archer · Myers v. State · State v. Plachta
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This is so because intentional misconduct is a necessary element of fraud. Indeed, to prove fraud, a plaintiff must establish that the defendant made a deliberate and knowing misrepresentation designed to cause, and actually causing detrimental reliance by the plaintiff.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]here there is no proper objection to the use of a general verdict, reversal is improper where no error is found as to one of two issues submitted to the jury on the basis that the appellant is unable to establish that he has been prejudiced.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Finding liability on one claim does not entitle the respondents to receive the total amount of damages attributable to both theories of liability.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.