Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 511 So. 2d 540 - McRae v. JD/MD, Inc.

511 So. 2d 540 - McRae v. JD/MD, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
6
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably Alexander Proudfoot Co. World Headquarters L.P. v. Thayer (1989), Servewell Plumbing, LLC v. Summit Contractors, Inc. (2005)

1 federal appellate · 41 state decisions

2001987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on M/s Bremen v. Zapata off-Shore Company · 493 So. 2d 437 - Manrique v. Fabbri · Mallard v. Aluminum Co. of Canada · 139 So. 2d 911 - Huntley v. Alejandre · 455 So. 2d 1121 - Maritime Ltd. Partnership v. Greenman Ad. A.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a forum selection clause, designating Florida as the forum, cannot operate as the sole basis for Florida to exercise personal jurisdiction over an objecting non-resident defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “attempt to establish personal jurisdiction in the first instance over an objecting defendant who has done none of the acts set forth in [the long-arm statute].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[W]e reject the suggestion that a defendant waives his due process right to contest the jurisdictional issue merely by signing a contract containing a per missive jurisdiction clause.... [W]e disapprove that portion of the district court’s analysis which elevates the “construction and enforceability of contracts,” over the requirements of both our long-arm statute and the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.