511 So. 2d 583 - Huhn v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably 511 So. 2d 575 - Biscardi v. State (1987), 781 So. 2d 413 - Avila v. State (2001)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rodriguez v. New York · 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State · 408 So. 2d 1024 - Jent v. State · 443 So. 2d 955 - State v. Murray · 509 So. 2d 281 - State v. Rousseau
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.410] clearly does not prohibit the trial court from ... having testimony reread; yet we have to assume, as reasonable people, that some, or all, of the jury so understood the trial court's remarks to mean such prohibition existed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[r]elevant evidence is inadmissible if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Also, there is really no provision for me to either reinstruct you after I instruct you or certainly to have any testimony read back or certainly to call any witnesses back. You are going to have to remember the testimony and the instructions on the law as best you can and probably the next time we hear from you will be when that buzzer in there rings and we all jump about a foot up in the air and then, you have a verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.