Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 511 So. 2d 629 - Hoover v. State

511 So. 2d 629 - Hoover v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1989
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · North Carolina v. Alford · United States v. Frady · Screws v. United States · United States v. Atkinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is not fundamental error to convict a defendant under an erroneous lesser included charge when he had an opportunity to object to the charge and failed to do so if: 1) the improperly charged offense is lesser in degree and penalty than the main offense or 2) defense counsel requested the improper charge or relied on that charge as evidenced by argument to the jury or other affirmative action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[A] prosecutor may not negotiate, and a trial court may not accept, a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to an offense which the undisputed evidence shows the defendant did not commit, notwithstanding that the defendant understands and acquiesces, for whatever reason, to the improper procedure.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.