¶1The parties herein agree that the order limiting damages on appellant’s counterclaim to the amount sought in appellee’s complaint was erroneous in light of Allie v. Ionata, 503 So.2d 1237 (Fla.1987). We agree.
¶2Reversed.
511 So. 2d 714
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 19, 1987
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1987-08-19
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1992
2 state decisions
Relies on 503 So. 2d 1237 - Allie v. Ionata
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1987-08-19
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The parties herein agree that the order limiting damages on appellant’s counterclaim to the amount sought in appellee’s complaint was erroneous in light of Allie v. Ionata, 503 So.2d 1237 (Fla.1987). We agree.
¶2Reversed.