Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

511 So. 2d 719

511 So.2d 719

12 Fla.L.Weekly 2062

Docket No. BP-153.

Brown v. State

James Junior BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 24, 1987.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1987-08-24

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1990

5 state decisions

Relies on 492 So. 2d 1308 - Williams v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1987-08-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Phil Patterson, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

¶2Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Brown appeals his convictions and sentences for burglary with assault, sexual battery and aggravated battery. We affirm the convictions but, because the reason given for imposing a departure sentence is invalid, we remand for resentencing.

¶5Brown's argument that his sentencing guidelines scoresheet improperly assessed 85 points for severe victim injury is without merit. However, we agree with his contention that no valid reason was given for imposition of a departure sentence. The trial court's stated reason for departure was the fact that Brown entered the victim's home in the middle of the night while she was sleeping and thus was vulnerable and unable to defend herself. This is not a valid reason for departure. Brown therefore must be resentenced within the guidelines. Williams v. State,492 So.2d 1308 (Fla. 1986).

¶6Reversed and remanded for resentencing.

¶7WENTWORTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

¶8BOOTH, J., dissents.

¶9BOOTH, J., dissenting.

¶10I would affirm the sentences imposed and hold valid the reasons given by the trial court for departure.

/511/so2d/719 · .json · Public domain