511 So. 2d 960 - State v. Ginebra’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
76 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently February 2020 · most notably 513 So. 2d 122 - State v. Fundora (1987), 756 So. 2d 42 - Peart v. State (2000)
76 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. United States · Juidice v. Vail · 402 So. 2d 606 - State v. Hawkins · 11 Cal. 3d 793 - People v. Superior Court (Giron) · United States v. Campbell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the mandatory minimum penalty provided by law, if any, and the maximum possible penalty provided by law.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he trial judge's obligation to ensure that the defendant understands the direct consequences of his plea has been consistently interpreted to encompass only those consequences of the sentence which the trial court can impose.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The focus of whether counsel provided constitutionally effective assistance in the context of a [guilty] plea is whether counsel provided his client “with an understanding of the law in relation to the facts, so that the accused may make an informed and conscious choice between accepting the prosecution’s offer and going to trial.” ... A defendant’s lack of knowledge that a plea of guilty may lead to deportation does nothing to undermine the plea itself which is, in effect, “a confession in open court as to the facts alleged.” (Citations omitted.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Zarate · State v. Rosas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.