Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 511 S.W.2d 308 - Simmons v. State

Simmons v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 2000
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2000

16 state decisions

1101974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Douglas v. People of State of California · Steel v. State · Curry v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whenever the court determines at an arraignment or at any time prior to arraignment that an accused charged with a felony or a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment is too poor to employ counsel, the court shall appoint one or more practicing attorneys to defend him. In making the determination, the court shall require the accused to file an affidavit, and may call witnesses and hear any relevant testimony or other evidence.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If the trial court finds that the defendant is indigent, the court should take the proper steps to provide appellant with a free transcription of the court reporter’s notes. (Citations omitted.) Proceedings may then be had in the trial court in accordance with Article 4-0.09, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.