Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

511 S.W.2d 402

Cawley v. Allums

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 9, 1974

Court of Appeals of Texas · decided 1974-05-09

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1975

2 state decisions

Relies on Kroger Company v. Warren

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1974-05-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

¶2In his motion for Rehearing, and Amended Motion, Appellant complains of the findings concerning his monthly payments of child support. He contends certain monthly payments were made which are not shown to have been paid in our original opinion.

¶3The findings of fact as filed by the trial court appear in our original opinion. These findings by the trial court were not challenged by appellant in his brief on appeal to this court. As set out in Kroger Company v. Warren, 420 S.W.2d 218 (Tex.Civ.App.-Houston 1st, 1967, no writ):

“It is necessary, however, that material findings of fact be challenged by appropriate points in appellants’ brief or else the appellants are bound by the findings of fact.”

¶4The motion for rehearing is overruled.

/511/sw2d/402 · .json · Public domain