Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 511 SW2D 442 - Hampton v. Gilmore

Hampton v. Gilmore’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
January 1994
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 1994

7 state decisions

40197419801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kattering v. Franz · Lane v. Katt · World Franchisers, Inc. v. Birk · Parker v. Wallace · First Community State Bank v. Newhart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Tjhose who elect to represent themselves in propria persona are entitled to no indulgence they would not have received if they had been represented by counsel. They are bound by the same rules of ... procedure as those who are admitted to practice law, and they are held to the same familiarity with required procedures and rules as would be attributed to a member of the bar.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.